Talk:Dalby–Cecil Plains Road

Untitled
IMHO the  tag is inappropriate for a small, well-researched article with 12 references. While not a fan of the “scattergun” approach some take with tags, they would be of more use in this case. Downsize43 (talk) 01:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. I respectfully disagree.  My rule of thumb is that if an article only needs one or two citations, then I use the cn, if there are 3 or more needed, and in this case there are at least 9 unreferenced assertions in the article, then the overall more refs tag at the top of the page is appropriate. Onel 5969  TT me 09:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I have added a few refs but have no idea what are the 9 you mentioned. Please mark them so I can know what you believe should be addressed. Downsize43 (talk) 21:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)