Talk:Dallas School District locker room controversy

I thought the lead section of the article was clear and easy to understand and fragmented, I thought the structure was had several headings and subheading arranged chronologically or by themes which was very helpful, it was also clear, I thought the content was written without bias toward a particular point of view, cited reliable sources throughout the article and as much as possible, and includes citation information from reliable publishers.

This is a well put together article with a good amount of sources. In line citations and wiki links are also well placed. The flow of the article is very good, and it's a perfect length for the amount of information available. You could possibly add more wiki links, although it's not necessary. The introductory paragraph is very well done, and introduces the topic nicely. Overall, I wouldn't change much. i also agree with all the statements made by the above user. LycomingO360 (talk) 20:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

More feedback
I agree. This is a good start to the article. There are some small re-writes needed to maintain a neutral point of view. -- Sandbergja (talk) 02:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

I still believe that this a a very good article well put together and it very understanding and put in fragment to be able to follow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emeraldamartinez (talk • contribs) 15:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Reviewed under new article review process. I noticed that there is a proposal to merge the article. I'm not commenting on that. IMO it fulfills wp:notability and I'm marking it as reviewed..

North8000 (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)