Talk:Dalmatian Italians/Archives/2008/April

I TOO am disgusted by this excessive croatian nationalism
Now I understand why Zenanarh was accused in the arbitration about Dalmatia. And I will NO MORE PARTICIPATE in Dalmatian articles, because I believe Wikipedia is a project open to all the opinions, not only the ones of the Croatian nationalists. Indeed, I totally agree with Mariokempes and Cherso. Here it is a copy of their last posts:


 * < The group of Croatian nationalists (Kubura, ZenanarTh, ecc...) got what they want - mainly after the lynching/ban of Giovanni Giove by admins too much friendly to them - and now they aim to have free hands to do whatever they want with the articles about Dalmatia, like this one on Dalmatian Italians....--Cherso (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)>>

One final question to a possible administrator reading my last post on Dalmatia topics: why only GiovanniGiove has been banned? The harassment done by Zenanarh (and others like Kubura) to whoever disagrees with croatian nationalistic points of view is totally similar -or even worse- to what has done GiovanniGiove. Even user:Dewrad has experienced this harassment. --Pannonicus (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice misinterpretation... it was not me accused. BTW your contributions are totally the same as Giovanni Giove's ones. And he is banned. Zenanarh (talk) 09:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * In answer to your question, Pannonicus, Giove was banned (by uninvolved Admins) because he violated his Wikipedia edit revert restriction, not because of his... diligence on certain articles. What's all this about then? I cannot believe this article is STILL a battleground. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 13:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * "What's all this about then?" Whether this article should have a big Italian flag across the top of its talk page. There's more of the same going on elsewhere, too. You see, you can leave for a couple of months, and come back, but nothing changes... ;-) AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It does look pointless dosen't it, Mariokempes is right, Wikipedia can't deal with these guys... This entire article is about a minority that could fit in a couple of school buses!, all for the purpose of giving the irredentists a place to write about how god damn wrong it is that there aren't any more Italians in Dalmatia! I wrote more than half of this article because the Italian historic influence in Dalmatia was noteworthy, but it keeps getting rewritten (in bad quality) with irredentist and ultra-nationalist additions. This place is NOT (or at least should not be) a vent for your political frustrations. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 20:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Who's Pannonicus? Who was his supporter? See his talkpage. Banned user:Crystalclearchanges. Also, which unregistered user wrote this on Dewrad's talkpage? "these Croats are insane.". Kubura (talk) 13:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Here's more. The tag "Wikiproject Italy" was added on 26 February 2008 in 19:30, by unregistered user 209.215.160.101, who wrote this insulting content (what does "...gg" in comment stands for? Giovanni Giove?). He also started to etiquette me on Italian Wikipedia, that very same day, 21:52, 26 feb 2008 and 22:06, 26 feb 2008. - 26 Feb 2008, 19:31, a minute later after tagging, he inserted the tag - after being reverted by AlasdairGreen27 on 27 Feb in 09:48... - another unregistered user 4.231.207.47 appeared and reverted on 27 Feb in 19:48 (as "Mary") - Zenanarh reverted on 28 Feb 06:54 - now, user:Pannonicus appear, and tags it again on 1 March 2008 - finally, Pannonicus has disguised himself, another Giovanni Giove's defender, on 3 March 2008, 16:12 Do we deal with Giove again? Now, see whome we're dealing with. Kubura (talk) 13:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

"Mary" is user:Marygiove, sockpuppet of Giovanni Giove. See report and discussion on ANI archive. Kubura (talk) 07:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I believe Kubura (and others) sees sockpuppets of Giovanni Giove everywhere: this looks like a kind of paranoia! (LOL, LOL, LOL)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was no consensus. JPG-GR (talk) 18:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Dalmatian Italians → Italian minority in Dalmatia — In the hope that this article can finally cease to be a battleground, I believe we should make it as neutral and encyclopedic-sounding as possible. One of the most important issues facing anyone there is the title, as it can be interpreted as a form of cultural pretention towards Dalmatia. In short, this article is about a national minority (as everyone accepts), we should simply name it as such in order to avoid confusion and further neutralize tensions. —-- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 23:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Comment A similar move request was last proposed less than six months ago (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequested_moves&diff=162643260&oldid=162636219). JPG-GR (talk) 00:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * A move was proposed earlier, but to a completely different name. That proposal was to change the entire purpose of the article. Due to the small size of this minority, the suggestion then was to effectively repurpose the article, emphasizing greatly on the much more significant historic presence. This move suggests merely a more neutral wording to the title, without any change as to the purpose or emphasis of the article. The first renaming is certainly not identical to this one. --  DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 00:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. Due to reasons mentioned above. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 09:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. But be aware that there is an irridentist campaign underway on Wiki to project Italian influence and authority beyond its frontiers onto the various territories that they still covet. This article is just a part of the strategy. The other articles so far include Corfiot Italians, Maltese Italians, Corsican Italians and Nizzardo Italians. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 09:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Lets not forget the beautifully titled article Istrian Exodus, of which the very name suggests the Italian population has been forcefully(!) removed from their (Italian) lands. It is an incredible exaggeration to say the least. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 10:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose. There is an irredentist campaign under way, true, but that should not lead us to give up the correct article name. As I mentioned earlier, research journals even in Croatia (like the Croatian Political Science Review) use the term "Dalmatian Italians". Article names are here Banat Swabians, Burgenland Croats (not Croatian minority in the Burgenland, to name just a few. There are other problems with the article than with its name (eg. the problem of historic continuity of the minority, ethnic shift = Croatians who became culturally Italianized or partially later (re?)croatized). Please leave the article name intact and don't fall into just another nationalist fallacy. --DaQuirin (talk) 12:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * All I'm trying to do, DaQuirin, is to make the article name as neutral as possible. After all, its you guys that insisted on this article's purpose being the national minority. I do not understand how the proposed name is incorrect in any way? It is about the Italian national minority in Dalmatia and its history, isn't it? You're right about mentioning the other articles, though, you should know that I would support their renaming to a similar form. Because of the turbulent "past" of this article we should make its name as official and unambiguous as possible (how one can call that "nationalistic" is beyond my understanding). The journal uses the current term because it is shorter simpler to use in a sentence, not because they do not consider "Dalmatian Italians" to be an "Italian national minority in Dalmatia". -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 13:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * DaQuirin, you haven't read my explanation at all? "Nationalist fallacy"? DaQuirin, you don't know what you're talking about. Articles about nationalities are made and named according to country, not according to the region. For Banat, I don't know. For Burgenland Croats, they are too specifical case. I may live with my family in Burgenland for 50 years, but I couldn't be Burgenland Croat (I'd be just another Croat in Austria). Kubura (talk) 12:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, it seems there it is a "nationalist fallacy" against these Dalmatian Italians, who are "a specifical case" like the Burgerland Croats. Just read the above discussions between Italians and Croats and the simple fact that this is another additional request to move and change it. --BurtReed (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. There is one very important fact about term "Dalmatian Italians". In origin this term was Italo-Dalmati reffering the mostly to the Dalmatians who were using Italian language in the public life. It was not reffering to the small number of the Italians who came to the eastern Adriatic coast in the first half of 19th century because of their industrial business, trade or season work. This term was developed in 18th and 19th century and was just politically motivated attempt to create some new ethnical identity. Before that there were just Venetians, Italians, Croats or simply Slavs. After that there were just Italians and Croats. The most of these Italo-Dalmatians simply dissapeared in the 2nd half of 19th century, since the most of them restored their original Croatian names, following political defeat of the "Autonomist party" ideas. The main problem of this article and this name is Italian irredentism which is using advantage of its historical occurance to produce fake history of Dalmatia and it's very easy to notice it in this article. Like the beginning of their history in Illyrian ages. LOL Thanks God it's not the Stone Ages, it's already quite enough stupid this way. Shameful robbery of attributes of an older ethnic group - Romance speakers (original Dalmatian language) in the early Medieval - not connected to any kind of Italian identity at all. This article can be objective with its temporar title only if describing political movements in a few Dalmatian cities in 19th century and "Italo-Dalmati" can be related only to the members or the leaders of the "Autonomist party" who were the loudest users of this name. The real true is that there was never such etnicity in Dalmatia, with attributes of a distinguished etnic group. People under this neme were Italians or Croats by ethnicity. It is also clearly shown by the Austrian censi, where the real ethnicities were hidden under 2 "definitions" - Italians (reffering to the speakers of Italian language in public life, since Italian language was imposed as administrative one, so this is not an attribute which defines ethnicity) and Slavs (reffering to all others who didn't speak it at all, since they were living out of the cities). The point is that these "Italians" must be separated in 2 groups: the minor part of the real Italians who were sitting in the administrative chairs and the major part of the Croats who were adapting to the political situation. And all together they made just around 15% of overall Dalmatian population in the 1st half of 19th century. If we keep this title, we are just giving opportunity to Italian irredentists for spreading their POV, unfortunatelly they are not ready to write objectively. In our modern times this name exists only in their heads, the descendents of the Italians in Dalmatia are Italian minority, not Dalmatian Italians, Italo-Dalmatians or whatever. Zenanarh (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Support to renaming to "Italians in Croatia" proposed by User:Kubura. Zenanarh (talk) 16:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll repeat: 1) Dalmatia is not only in Croatia, there are more Italians living in Montenegrin Dalmatia. 2) There are a LOT more Croatian Italians living outside Dalmatia. I don't see how this article can be named into "A portion of the Italians in Croatia and Montenegro". Let's settle for this version of the name as a temporary compromise. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 16:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose. That 'd be a huge mistake . This should be the part of the article Italians in Croatia. Otherwise, we've fallen into the same trap: the name/adjective "Croatia" is evaded, and that was the interests of Italian iredentists. Kubura (talk) 13:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Support to renaming, but Oppose to the proposed new title (Italian minority in Dalmatia). That 'd be a huge mistake . This should be the part of the article Italians in Croatia. Otherwise, we've fallen into the same trap: the name/adjective "Croatia" is evaded, and that was the interest of Italian iredentists. See Zenanarh's remarks about abuses above. Kubura (talk) 12:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Kubura, this article is not about the Italian minority in Croatia, it is about the Italian minority in Dalmatia as a region, wich also includes Boka Kotorska (Montenegro). In fact, according to the current information in the article, there are more Italians in Montenegrin (500) than Croatian Dalmatia (300). We cannot rename the article into what you suggested, because that is not its subject. In short, Dalmatia is not an entirely Croatian region, I hope you'll change your vote. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 13:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Than we should split and merget the content into two articles: "Italians in Croatia" and "Italians in Montenegro". Kubura (talk) 12:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The article is not about all Italians in Croatia, but only about the 200-300 that live in Dalmatia (mostly Split and Zadar). For now I suggest we simply change the name into a more encyclopedic version, precisely BECAUSE of your argument: because Dalmatia is not a country (yet;) and the current article is pretentious towards Croatian and Montenegrin territory. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 14:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose. as per WP:COMMON and the fact that the move is driven purely by Balkan Nationalism rather than actual merits of the move to Wikipedia. This is the standard way in which ethnic groups are sorted, for random example Indo Italian, British Indian, Indian-Germans. It doesn't mean Indians are trying to "take those countries", as some anti-Italians are suggesting in this case, its just how things like that are organised on Wikipedia. - Gennarous (talk) 22:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment/spam: There is actually no overarching standard for naming of these ethnic group articles; a large number do not follow the "Fooian Barian" pattern because reliable sources do not use that kind of name. I've documented a variety of naming patterns at the proposed guideline page Naming conventions (immigrant ethnic groups) (said guideline itself may need a rename). Appreciate any comments at the talk page there. Cheers, cab (talk) 07:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * "Balkan nationalism"? This article was started by Italian nationalists, namely a user blocked for his POV edits. It has been a continual struggle to keep it relatively neutral ever since.-- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 09:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, have a look at Rab concentration camp. You'll get a fairly clear idea about where Gennarous stands on these matters. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 11:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Simply amazing, aded the article to my watchlist. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 15:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose. For the same reasons of DaQuirin, because Research journals even in Croatia (like the Croatian Political Science Review) use the term "Dalmatian Italians". Article names are here Burgenland Croats (not "Croatian minority in the Burgenland", to name just a few. This is an excerpt from the article "Identitetski “lomovi” dalmatinskih Talijana" (Identity "conflict" of Dalmatian Italians) of Mirko Đinđić: ".......The article investigates the historical discourse of the pivotal political and ideological “turning points” defining the national identity of Dalmatian Italians. Each period is represented by some political figures from the ranks of Dalmatian Italians such as Bajamonti, Duplancich and others......."  Clearly the term DALMATIAN ITALIANS is used by the scholar community: why change or move it? --BurtReed (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Well, buddy you actually don't understand what it says. "Identitetski “lomovi” dalmatinskih Talijana" - better translation is "Identity breakdowns of..." Lom (Cro) = fracture, rupture but also disorder, confusion. Also it says "dalmatinski Talijani" - since the first letter of dalmatinski is small it is an adjective by Croatian grammatics, so it has the same meaning as "Italians in Dalmatia". What you propose would be Dalmatinski Talijani and not dalmatinski Talijani!!! Actually such term doesn't exist in the serious scholar community at all. That's the point. For more precise information about this "ethnonym"(???) see my comment in "Discussion" section below. Zenanarh (talk) 18:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well Buddy, "Identity conflict of Dalmatian Italians" is EXACTLY what is written in that post on the Mirko Đinđić's article: blame the guys of the "Croatian Political Science Review" for it, not me. Dalmatian Italians is a name like Banat Swabians, Burgenland Croats, Baltic Germans and many others in wikipedia: I totally OPPOSE the rename that want to be done. Please leave the article name intact and don't fall into just another nationalist fallacy, as DaQuirin wrote.--BurtReed (talk) 22:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Whatever, it can be "conflict" it's all the same, what do you think it means if not problem hidden within that name? We are trying to rename the article into something objective and that is "Italians" since there was such ethnicity in Dalmatia. Ethnicity by the name "Dalmatian Italians" simply didn't exist. Get it? On your user page it's written: I don't know if there will be a fourth world war, but I know that will be fought with stones only....Let's stop the crazy nationalism of the twentieth century! Are you actually concious of the fact that you are this moment engaged in restoring of the nationalistic claims of a political group in Dalmatia from 19th century? A group which claims were thrown away already until the end of 19th century and temporarily restored during fascistic occupation of Dalmatia? Now you try to defend resurection of that quite extreme nationalistic ghost? Or you want to stop only nationalism of 20th century and awake that from 19th? Are you serious? Zenanarh (talk) 10:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Read my section above 'I too am disgusted by this excessive croatian nationalism'.--Pannonicus (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * OPPOSE. I agree with DaQuirin to leave the article name intact and don't fall into just another nationalist fallacy. And I agree with Gennarous that the move is driven purely by Balkan Nationalism rather than actual merits of the move to Wikipedia. The name Dalmatian Italians is identical to other minority names - with the geographical name before the ethnic name - like:
 * Banat Swabians, Burgenland Croats, Baltic Germans
 * Baltic Russians, Shanghai Russians, Harbin Russians
 * Bessarabia Germans, Crimea Germans, etc.
 * British Indian, Indian-Germans, etc.

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

It's not up to us to decide on the "true identity" of this (more or less) historic group. And please don't use purely political arguments for a move. We are in need for relevant references instead of a one-sided (?) POV. I came up some time ago with the article from Mirko Đinđić, in the "Croatian Political Science Review" (03/2007), Identity 'Conflict' of Dalmatian Italians, see the summary here. So far, this is only a useless chat here. --DaQuirin (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Mate, all these articles are a useless chat. My grandmother's fanny gets more traffic than these crappy irridentist articles and she's been dead for 30 years. So it's all a pile of bollocks. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * (LOL!:D how true) DaQuirin, are you saying we need to prove this article is about the Italian minority in Dalmatia? Because it is only so due to the demands of the "Italian side" of the discussions herein. "Dalmatian Italians" and "Italian minority in Dalmatia" are synonyms, different only in wording. This difference, however, is important as the proposed title is obviously more neutral and official, as well as less pretentious. I really don't see the problem with the rename, its not that big of a deal. Furthermore, I'll repeat that if "Dalmatian Italians" is a more frequent phrase, it is only because it is shorter and easier to use in a sentence, not because the authors do not believe that they are talking about the Italian minority in Dalmatia. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 00:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm g'na start an article called "Italian efforts to use Wikipedia to show how they control most of the Mediterranean, Adriatic and North Africa". Bloody hell. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 00:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * lol!1 :D Come on man, they're not nearly all like that. Most Italians on Wiki are (of course) level-headed, modern thinking people. I think only some of rather indoctrinated "esuli" are going beyond rationality here (trouble is they're damn diligent!). I think the article should be named "Irredentist efforts to use Wikipedia to show how they control most of the Mediterranean, Adriatic and North Africa", I'll have you know I intend to request a move immediately should you try to create such a preposterously entitled NATIONALISTIC article. ;) --  DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 01:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Let's get a few things straight, I don't see how we can rename this article by using state names (even though that would be best, probably). There are serious obstacles: Therefore, the article can't be renamed into "Croatian Italians" or "Italians in Croatia and Montenegro". I've suggested, therefore, that we alleviate the rather pretentious wording of the name by "officializing" it into "Italian minority in Dalmatia", if nothing else then at least as a temporary step. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 16:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Dalmatia is a region/province that includes Boka Kotorska, Montenegro. In fact, there are more Italians living there (500), than in Croatian Dalmatia (300).
 * There are approximately 100 times more Italians in Croatia's Istria and Rijeka (30,000) than in Croatian Dalmatia (300).


 * OK, we must clear some things first. Temporary title of this article is "Dalmatian Italians" and we all agree it doesn't stand. It's written in abusive way as Italian Irredentistic propaganda and renaming is just first step. So I have question:
 * Who is this article talking about?
 * In my opinion 3 answers are possible:
 * Italian minority in the region called Dalmatia in Croatia, in this case we are actually discussing about "Italians in Croatia". Italians per ethnicity! There is some logic here since a large part of the article describes also Italians in Kvarner and Istria, in Croatia, not only in Dalmatia. Then Italians in Montenegro are out.
 * Italian minority in the province called Dalmatia in Austrian Monarchy in 19th century, this is what user:DIREKTOR noted as "Italians in Croatia and Montenegro". Italians per ethnicity! In this case Kvarner and Istria are out and the article content overlaps political borders of Croatia and Montenegro. This is not really by wiki policy.
 * Pro-Italians of multiple ethnicities, so not Italian minority in Croatia or Montenegro, but rather the members of the political movement in the Austrian province called Dalmatia in 19th century. Not Italians per ethnicity! So I'll repeat: term "Dalmatian Italians" is abuse of the original term "Italo-Dalmati". On this basis irredentists build their claims, producing non-existant ethnicity and... just read the article. It's important not to forget that there were also "Slavo-Dalmati" in the same time. In this case we are talking about political movements in Dalmatia and different streams involved. Both streams were separatistic towards Austrian Monarchy and concentrated on Dalmatia as a region. Both streams came from the same political party - "Autonomist Party": Italo-Dalmati led by Biamonti - a mayor of Split, Slavo Dalmati led by administrator Lapenna. Both streams were sometimes (not always) insisting on "Dalmatianhood" as basis for introducing new etnicity - Dalmatian one, although there were never such attributes needed to define new ethnos, except living in the region called Dalmatia. Both streams were for autonomy of Dalmatia. Difference between them was that "Italo-Dalmati" wanted Dalmatia annexed to Italy. Of course there was also the 3rd political option the "People's Party" introducing the Croathood of Dalmatians, annexation to Croatia and they actually won the Dalmatian Assembly in the 2nd half of 19th century, representing the huge majority of population in Dalmatia. As you can see Italian irredentists abuse the name of just one small stream of the "Autonomists". There was pamphlet by Italo-Dalmat Biamonti in 1864: "Immidiately Slavs, never Croats!" Or quote by Slavo-Dalmat Demattei, a mayor of Kotor, written in the autonomist newspaper Il Dalmata in 1868: "We are all Dalmatians. Here in Kotor some say we are Serbs, the others we are Croats or Italians. In Dalmatia we are all Dalmatians."
 * As you can see there are 3 possible resolutions. In first 2 cases it's about Italians per ethnicity, the article should be split into 2 new articles, renamed and cleaned up of all propaganda. In 3rd case it's about pro-Italian political stream in 19th century, not an ethnic group, the article should be renamed and cleaned up of all propaganda, ethnicity related rubbish and placed into proper political environment of 19th century Dalmatia.
 * I'd like to hear your opinions. Zenanarh (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

If you guys really want to change the name into one with state names, then this is the only way: two articles need to be Created called "Italians in Croatia" and "Italians in Montenegro". The article would need to be rewritten and a lot of things would have to be added, but we would end up with two real high-quality minority articles. The Dalmatian Italians article can be incorporated mostly into the "Italians in Croatia" article, with portions of it copy-pasted into the "Italians in Montenegro" article (obviously we would have to write some more stuff for Montenegro). Now this is a lot of work, would someone be interested in handling the Montenegrin article by himself? -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 19:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

LoL, no responses... :) -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 17:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey guys, do you understand that there are persons who oppose the rename? Why do you write "Temporary title of this article is "Dalmatian Italians" and we all agree it doesn't stand"? I don't agree, even DaQuirin and others don't agree! This is not democratic, guys. This is wikipedia, or isn't it? --BurtReed (talk) 22:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

All I wanted was a small change to a more official name, but I guess even that's impossible. When a controversial article is created it isn't likely to change at all. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 00:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.