Talk:Damansara Utama National Secondary School

Crazy
With all the vandalism, I guess its wise to lock the page and start from scratch. Might be difficult for me though, I don't have much experience. Applause for the one who locked this(but the comments WERE funny).

What?
Most were true, cept for those absurd ones. Thats how we feel and it's a wonder why nobody has written a letter to the Ministry of Education ( or maybe many people did, but to no response..typical government work) 218.208.244.89 13:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Well, this is Wikipedia, not a ranting forum. The ministry wont just sack Norsham for doing her job. 60.50.53.70 10:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC) (Kempas 2005-2006)

Wikipedia is viewed by many people. It wouldn't be wise to use wikipedia as a ranting place. Besides, Pn. Norsham is just doing her job. Syasha15 02:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Rant or not, most of the facts are true, and luckily like faux, i'm already out of that problematic school —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.64.185 (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

''SMK Damansara Utama prides itself for producing achievers in many areas. Most of the students graduating will most likely attend colleges (namely Taylors and Sunway), continue on with Form 6 or pursue further studies at local matriculation centres among other things.''

[edit] Achievements <-What. Anugerah Sekolah Harapan Negara - Runner Up

I can't pinpoint everything thats wrong with this article... But I can, however, tell you that it will not win the Pulitzer prize. TL;DR: This article is filled with AIDS and failure. To fix this: REWRITE THE WHOLE THING. IT'S CRAP.

60.52.33.175 16:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

actually you have a point in that this article is filled with useless information, and that it needs some serious re-editing. But please do not blame the less experienced (such as myself) for not being very up to standard on editing. If we made a mistake, just correct it. And you said you're going to fix it. Then fix it, and let's see how good you are. And no, I did not edit this article. And please let's all try to be a little more civilized about the problems in this article rather than just ranting pointlessly about it. I didn't see YOU anywhere when some bold people were saving this thing from vandalism. Hey, compared to that, this article is a godsend. And by the way are you a student? Do not just rant on about it, you're all talk and no action. Be bold, in contribution, not in showing of your language.60.53.145.47 (talk) 14:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)