Talk:Dame (Luis Miguel song)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DarjeelingTea (talk · contribs) 00:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

This can be passed to GA status. The review follows. DarjeelingTea (talk) 00:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Well-written
The article is well-written.
 * The use of "15 July 1996" seems unusual for encyclopedic prose but is acceptable per MOS:DATEVAR so that's okay.
 * The second-to-last sentence under "music video" places a period inside quotation marks, which is different than the use throughout the rest of the article, however, from looking at the original quote it appears it is accurately quoting the full stop from the source.
 * The lede complies with WP:LEDE and represents an accurate summary of the main points of the article.
 * no other grammar, spelling, or structural problems observed; article is clear and layout is acceptable
 * There were some other issues noted in the previous GA-review which have been addressed.

Verifiable / no original research
The article is verifiable, with no evidence of original research or plagiarism.
 * Plagiarism: Earwig indicates "violation unlikely"
 * Sourcing: Every sentence is supported by one or more inline citations. All sources are RS or limited RS for purposes of music topics.
 * No claims are made that are unsupported by sources, or sourced exclusively to primary sources. No evidence of WP:OR.
 * The method of sourcing has some variation which will probably need to be standardized if the article were to receive an A-class or FA review.

Broad in coverage
The article is broad in coverage while remaining focused on the topic and addressing all reasonable aspects expected of a song article. A cursory search I conducted for other significant information on this topic turned-up empty-handed.

Neutral
The article presents a NPOV.

Stable
meets criteria
 * There are no outstanding content disagreements on the Talk page.
 * Virtually all edits in the last two months have been by the nominator or bots.

Images
meets criteria
 * There are two images and one media file, all of which are correctly licensed, or meet the requirements for non-free media.