Talk:Damköhler numbers

I think that the equation after this line "It is also defined as the ratio of the characteristic fluidic and chemical time scales" is upside down. Please check. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashi Starshade (talk • contribs) 00:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

The graph showing increasing n has no axis labels. That makes it hard to interpret. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.191.124.34 (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

The two notions of Da^II are not in agreement 2601:C0:CA80:92E0:5D0B:143B:7C4D:8E9C (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)