Talk:Dan Cocoziello/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose meets the reasonably well written criteria.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References check out, but this reference contradicts the information in the inforbox.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Although the date and place of birth are mentioned in the infobox, they do not appear in the article.
 * He attended elementary school at Gil St. Bernards. Where is this?
 * ... taking an entrance exam for the Delbarton School ' Where is this?
 * College career: Did he study anything other than lacrosse at college?
 * Professional career. There is no real substance here.
 * However, his National Lacrosse League rights were acquired by the Philadelphia Wings in the 2010 Orlando Titans dispersal draft. What does this mean?
 * This fails on broadness. This amounts to a few lines of prose thrown together from sports database and few news articles.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * None used
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No, I don't feel that this article meets WP:GACR#3 - Broad in its coverage. There is really little substance here, I get no feeling for this person, just a list of achievements and that is it. Perhaps when he has actually played some top level games there will be enough material for a good article, but there really isn't enough there now. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No, I don't feel that this article meets WP:GACR#3 - Broad in its coverage. There is really little substance here, I get no feeling for this person, just a list of achievements and that is it. Perhaps when he has actually played some top level games there will be enough material for a good article, but there really isn't enough there now. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)