Talk:Dan Kroffat

Requested move

 * The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

"Cowboy" Dan Kroffat → Dan Kroffat over disambiguation page

The Hatnote (or hatlink) at the top of this article sould be enough. There really isn't a need to have a separte disambiguation page to disambiguate this article from Philip Lafond. Stephen Day (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC) The "hatlink" is usually used on a well known article with a link to a not well known article of the same name. Both Dan Kroffats were known well with that particular name, so a disambuigation page is needed. RandySavageFTW (talk) 06:11, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support This guys name actually is Dan Kroffat, and the hatlink takes care of anybody looking for the other guy.  TJ   Spyke   04:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

I just said that. RandySavageFTW (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment What is it about the disambig page exactly that you believe can't be taken care of by the hatnote? Stephen Day (talk) 21:56, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Who was better known as Kroffat? That's debateable. That's why we have a disambuigation page, it shouldn't redirect to either. RandySavageFTW (talk) 18:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment OK, somebody is looking for information on Phil Lafond, but they only know him from his days in Japan where he wrestled as Dan Kroffat. They look up "Dan Kroffat" and come to what is now "Cowboy" Dan Kroffat. They quickly realize that this isn't the person they were looking for, but see the hatnote and click the link which takes them to where they want to go. Disambiguation pages should only be used when they are needed for navigation. How does the page you created acomplish this goal any quicker than the hatnote? The navigation was already clear. Stephen Day (talk) 01:37, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment I would agree if both articles were named "Dan Kroffat," but they weren't and Dan Kroffat and Philip Lafond aren't anywhere close to being similiar. Since this is the case my above argument still stands. Stephen Day (talk) 22:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose. People get to the article they seek by two means:  searching, and navigating links.  By definition, an ambiguous title ("Dan Kroffat") accumulates incoming links that need disambiguation.  Meaning, links that need to be edited in the linking article.  Putting a disambiguation page at the ambiguous title isolates those links, which is very helpful.  See Disambiguation pages with links.  --Una Smith (talk) 04:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Continued discussion of above (lmao at it being archived)
Kroffat and Lafond aren't anywhere close to being similar? LOL. Because two Canadian wrestlers who were best known with the same name aren't similar. Yeah. RandySavageFTW (talk) 12:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I do see your point even if I don't agree with it, but I'd actually say that Lafond is probably better known as Phil Lafon due to his run in the WWF in the late 90s under that name. Stephen Day (talk) 07:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)