Talk:Dan Lipinski/Archive 1

Merge request
While much of the material in the 3rd District article should also be here, it should remain on that page as well, as discussing the positions of representatives is vital in describing district politics (see talk page for that article). MisfitToys 22:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes the article on the congressmen should remain distinct from the article on the district.- thank you Astuishin (talk) 03:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Immigration
This section needs work, if for no other reason than the only citation is to an anti-immigration blog. --Sjsilverman (talk) 01:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Which political issues and votes to include?
More generally, some standard should apply to determine which votes to discuss. If there is legislation in which Lipinski played an important role, these should be highlighted. Votes on particularly controversial pieces of legislation perhaps should also be included if they are likely to be of wide interest. Seemingly random selection of discussion of votes like the one on the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 don't seem merited unless this is an issue that Lipinski has emphasized. Or am I missing something? --Sjsilverman (talk) 01:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd say that if the vote is covered by a third-party media source, then this coverage can be used in the article. If not, then it shouldn't be. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 15:35, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Dan Lipinski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110923053047/http://www.lipinskiforcongress.com/ to http://www.lipinskiforcongress.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)