Talk:Dan Rosenfield

Does this page still qualify as a stub?
Wikipedia’s description of a stub article is quite ambiguous, defining one as “lacking the breadth of coverage expected from an encyclopedia”. I feel as if this article now has adequate information, however I thought that it would be best to develop a consensus before I removed the stub tag. DanJWilde (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Edits on 30 January 2022 by myself and 213.205.198.156
I've added to the talk page in an effort to avoid edit warring. I do not believe the article as written by 213.205.198.156 was in line with Biographies of living persons and Good articles due to frankly trivial information being included as well as the page failing to strike a balance and failing to present negative articles conservatively as stipulated by Biographies of living persons.

I would additionally remind 213.205.198.156 that Wikipedia's guidelines advise editors to assume good faith; I do not appreciate being accused of attempting to whitewash the page, especially not with personal interest. If it happens again I will seek guidance from Wikipedia's more senior editors as to what steps I can/should take to prevent it. Asrieltheoracle (talk) 09:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Photograph
Is there a more recent photo of him? The current one looks very out of date. 92.40.179.234 (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Searching 'Dan Rosenfield' on Wikimedia Commons doesn't herald any more results, unless you can figure anything else to search which may give one. Asrieltheoracle (talk) 13:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)