Talk:Dan and Bramwell Noah

Recent edits
I am pinging as you are the major contributors to this article.

When I found this article, it looked closer to needing to be deleted than anything else. First of all, there are key notability issues, since this does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE guidelines. I cannot do too much about that (except perhaps taking it as a notability concern or nominating it for deletion), but here's what I did to improve the article:


 * 1) Renamed it according to their names. I do not see even a partial use of "Noah brothers" or "Noah Bros" in the description of their roles in the movies. So, it should be named according to their names if there is to be a dual article... another option, though, is to name it "Noah's Art Movies".
 * 2) Removed all the primary and unreliable sites. For articles that are Biographies of Living People, primary sources shouldn't be used at all - or for very limited information. imdb.com is WP:User-generated content and is not a reliable source, because there is no editorial control on the information. In addition, more than just that source is needed to add content to Wikipedia.
 * 3) I found reliable sources where I could and reworded content based upon the use of those sources.
 * 4) Content that I could not find sources for was moved to the talk page. Perhaps I missed something and there are other sources. For instance, there may be Australian newspapers that have some background information that I am not privy to.
 * 5) The article could have been tagged and deleted for it's promotional tone. I rewrote content in encyclopedic tone to resolve that issue. Not nearly as flowery or pretty, but this is an encyclopedia.

Anyway, that's why the article looks very different. I hope all of this makes sense. Please feel free to comment. I will be watching this page.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Just in case -- close connection info
There may not be a connection, but just in case, I thought I'd share the following:

If you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:25, 16 July 2017 (UTC)