Talk:Danah Zohar

This reads as a pioneering ground-breaking love letter
And I would suggest be deleted, honestly. Also, this person is not a physicist and, while I found her in an optics journal publishing with a chemist, is clearly not well-educated in physics from her solo writings. 99.135.144.233 (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion
Thank you User:Beeblebrox - in its current form this article is OK. It is now neutral and reasonably palatable. Jamesx12345 (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

issues
This article is now basically a short stub due to the removal of material that did not adhere to a neutral point of view and material that was not biographical in nature. I am looking for sources that could be used to turn this into a proper biography but most of what I have found so far is either too brief or trivial to be useful, blatant reprints of press release type material, or written by Zohar herself. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

I think in its current form it is as good as it is going to be. All her published material, including spiritual intelligence, needs work as it is somewhat biased. Jamesx12345 (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2012 (UTC)