Talk:Dangerous and offensive trades

Possible rename
At the AfD for this page, it was suggested that this be renamed. I agree the ampersand isn't appropriate in the title as it wouldn't typically be used in a statute. Capitalization should also be sentence case.

Personally I think Offensive trades is more common but I'd be happy with either that or Dangerous and offensive trades. Any other users have a preference?

Pinging @James500 as he was the one who suggested a rename to Dangerous and Offensive Trades. Oblivy (talk) 05:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @User:Oblivy: I agree that the ampersand should be removed. I agree that capitalization should be sentence case. Apart from that, I have no preference about the page name. I found names as diverse as offensive or dangerous or noxious trades or businesses or manufactures. I have no idea which of those names is most widely used, and I do not have time to try find out. If you want to move the page to Offensive trades, I do not care, provided there is a redirect at Dangerous and offensive trades. James500 (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  I'll just change to Dangerous and offensive trades then. Shouldn't be controversial as it's mainly conforming the title to policy, no redirects needed. Oblivy (talk) 00:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)