Talk:Danie Mellor/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This article meets the GA criteria in my opinion.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I fixed a few things.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Everything's cited, assuming accurate.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Looks good.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One image, no problem.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass, good work. —Noisalt (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass, good work. —Noisalt (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Featured Article?
Why the heck was this article used as a featured article? It's about an artist and it only has one very small low quality image at the bottom of the page. Just curious. I thought the standards for featured articles were much higher... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdaw (talk • contribs) 00:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)