Talk:Daniel 4

Untitled
I created this article because there is a set of articles on chapters in Daniel, and this is the only chapter not included.PiCo (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Scholarship
It's pretty obvious that this article is based on the views of academic scholars and Bible critics who contend that the Book of Daniel is folklore and legend. For the purposes of balance, it should also include the views of traditional Jewish scholarship which treats this as a sacred work important enough to be included as one of the 24 books of the Tanakh. Yoninah (talk) 09:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Saying that this particular origin for the Book of Daniel is "generally accepted" is a bit disingenuous. There are other theories that have significant support. Sturgeonslawyer —Preceding undated comment added 13:11, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

3RR exemption
As explained at. Tgeorgescu (talk) 13:55, 6 July 2020 (UTC)