Talk:Daniel D. Tompkins

Untitled
On what basis is there period after'' the "D"? john k 05:03, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Merger proposal
There's a separate stub article about Daniel Tompkins's wife Hannah, but, given the level of development of that article and the fact that Hannah Tompkins seems to have had little historical significance outside being the Veep's wife, I propose that the information in the Hannah Tompkins article be merged into a "Family" section in this article and --Dynaflow   babble  15:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, merge! Kraxler (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * As the Wife of the Vice President of the United States perhaps she should have her own page.-Emargie (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Women are people too! With reference made to her "office" as "Second Lady" of the United States it seems appropriate to me that she has her own small page. Gevan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.209.77 (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I think this is one case where WP:NOTINHERITED need not apply. I think the US Second Ladies are notable by default, and that a merger is not appropriate.  PK  T (alk)  11:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

The Title of the stub should be renamed to Hannah Minthorne Tompkins. Hannah Tompkins was an American artist (1920-1995) known for her works on Shakespearean themes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beflat (talk • contribs) 20:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Problem solved because the artist's article title was changed to Hannah Tompkins (artist).  PK T (alk)  11:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I say merge, nothing is notable by default and WP:NOTINHERITED does indeed apply 71.192.108.214 (talk) 18:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Why not? The Article seems to be a stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.191.49.80 (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The Wife of the Vice President of the United States page mentioned above has a list of all of the "Second Ladies", with links to articles; none are currently "red", so elsewhere in WP, the standard is being set that the "office of Second Lady" merits an article, albeit of stub length, if that's all the content that is available. Lini (talk) 11:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion
It has been suggested that this page be merged. The merge discussion seems to have strayed from this article but some content may need to be added here from the other article as a section or smaller mention and merger proposal be closed.✅--Amadscientist (talk) 14:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * At least four editors were against the merge, there was no consensus to merge, obviously.--Milowent • hasspoken 16:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The article in question contains information that relates to this subject and that contents has been Selective paste merged. This article is the target article and the Hannah article is in a separate AFD discussion, but the discussion here is preserved. If the article is deleted it can be redirected here. If it remains this article is not effected.--Amadscientist (talk) 21:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Merge was partial not full contnet from host article and is attributed with no redirect.--Amadscientist (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 12:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)