Talk:Daniel David

Untitled
I was one of poeple who participated in the elaboration of this article. I guess that all the information offered are verified and verifiable. I will explore egain the artcile to check that all info. is verified and balanced.

Alin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.151.33 (talk • contribs)


 * You consider this paragraph I deleted NPOV? "Considered by his peers a beautiful mind and a brilliant person, his research work was prized by major figures in the field. Thus, Dr. Albert Ellis said that '...his research work is a gem and it speaks about a young genius...' and Dr. Aaron T. Beck said that '...I do consider him one of the most knowledgeable people in regard to the basic cognitive science underlying cognitive therapy...'"


 * And generally your article conflicts with the following Wikipedia policies: No original research, Verifiability and Neutral point of view. Let's discuss all the issues here (please do not delete the NPOV and cleanup tags until the discussion is over). Mentatus 07:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

I think you are correct. I was not the author of that text (maybe many people contributed); however, I after reading them, I have checked and found some of those references on the website (eg. at www.psychotherapy.ro); so, although they seem correct I agree it is too positive (for a living person!). It is good you took them out. However, the other comments seem correct and verifiable in my view.

Alin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.151.33 (talk • contribs)

I am sorry; I have posted that part of the text based on the reccomendations I found on the internet (serious ones see at www.psychotherapy.ro) and based on those presentations I attended myself when Dr. David was awarded various awards by his peers. However, I was not aware about the neutrality issue and indeed, the text is biased towards positive. So, I agree to delete that part of the text. (Mircea, Turda). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.79.125.134 (talk • contribs)

Well, the article seems balanced to me in this form. (Cosmin) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.231.19.85 (talk • contribs)

Interesting article and discussions. I did not know about the "Wikipedia" and but it is fun and useful (I guess). I know Daniel from various conferences (I am an assistant professor myself). He is like a magnet to people that is why he is so positively regarded. Just for curiosity, I have check the info. in professional sources and most of it is correct. Because he is not a magent to me (I think!) I have tempered to tone of the text and I have deleted all info. based on paraprofessional rather than professional sources. Based on this, I think it is correct to take out the tag (I will do it). If you do not agree with my actions (e.g., taking out some info., tempering the tone, taking out the tag) please let me know the reason and let us discuss (Dr. Ardelean Florin). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.123.87.200 (talk • contribs)


 * I guess some citations are still needed for the following statements:
 * "[..]by this Governmental position strongly influencing the reform of the postdoctoral programs in the Romanian educational system."
 * "Considering his background he represents a unique professional profile[..]"
 * "[..]he is the most cited Romanian psychologist in the international literature" (I could not find this statement confirmed on the Ad Astra website)
 * "[..]marked the reform of the clinical field in Romania, helping in moving the field from a '70s style approach to the modern one."


 * Please provide some sources (have a look also at the Verifiability policy). Mentatus 14:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Let me tell where I found some of the info. Ad-Astra (http://www.ad-astra.ro/cartea-alba/authors.php?order=n_articles&domain_id=150) The other sources can be found in his presentation in various books of him made by the publishers (http://www.polirom.ro/cauta.cgi?action=cauta&class=search&autor=David) I guess that those who wrote the articles could post the references in the article. Dr. Ardelean.

To Dr. Ardelean: why did you take out the text related to the Thomsom ISI? To the moderator: as one of the authors I have put the references. (Alin)

I have made changes that point to a more objective point of view and I have added references to sustain the statements in the text. I have removed the POV label (Silviu Matu)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daniel David. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160313065841/http://clr.ro/monitorweb_doina_nupunemana/2008/052.pdf to http://www.clr.ro/Rep_dil_2002/..%5CMonitorWeb_Doina_nupunemana%5C2008%5C052.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Daniel David.jpg