Talk:Daniel Seals

Content citation and removal
I'm seeing a couple of IPs either adding content that isn't properly cited or removing entire chunks of content without giving proper reasons. Probably to be expected in an election year but I wanted to document this.

User:71.228.10.185
User:71.228.10.185 keeps adding the following statement to the Daniel Seals article, "Seals altered his campaign biography to remove mention of Lieberman after MoveOn.org endorsed Ned Lamont, Lieberman's 2006 Democratic primary opponent." There are a handful of problems with this. First, linking MoveOn.org's endorsement with Seals supposed removal of information is speculation. You are assuming cause and effect, for which you have no basis. Second, there is no source cited, which is especially important for an article concerning a living person. Third, an endorsement in the Connecticut Democratic Senate Primary is not relevant to the Illinois 10th Congressional District General Election. Fourth, you referred to my edit as vandalism, despite me leaving detailed comments in the edit summary. Wikipedia users are supposed to assume good faith. Fifth, User:71.228.10.185 launched an ad hominem attack in the edit summary, saying "I wish this kid would grow up." Altogether, these factors are not creating a NPOV. Also, I need to mention that User:71.228.10.185 has made questionable edits before, including to the Mark Kirk article (Dan Seals opponent), which he/she was warned about by multiple users and editors, but these were ignored. Please see User talk:71.228.10.185. Eventually this lead to the user being blocked. This type of conduct will lead to being blocked again. Propol 13:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Residence
It would be nice to find some documentation for the statement, "He has promised to move into the 10th District if he wins the general election." I seem to recall reading it in a Pioneer Press article, although I don't remember when.

Similarly, I changed "one block," which was not exactly correct. Hopefully, "not far" is neutral and accurate.

Kirk didn't live in the district when he ran in 200 because he was working for the then-current congressman in D.C.