Talk:Daniela Buruiană

Move
It's really helpful to other editors when you move a page to give some kind of explanation. There is even a box marked "reason" that allows you to offer one as an edit summary. It's also helpful to go through what links here and especially to fix any double redirects that are created, as these are confusing to readers. This is all basic stuff that shouldn't really need pointing out. I'm not opposing the move, merely wondering why it was done without any explanation. She's under her full name in most lists, and the Romanian Wikipedia has her at Daniela Buruiană Aprodu. It seems that many news articles and such that show up with a Google search use the full name, while plenty of others leave off the "Aprodu". In that case it seems prudent to be scholarly and encyclopaedic and err on the side of completeness. As I said, an explanation would be helpful, as would a fixing of links. &mdash; Trilobite 20:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)