Talk:Danielle Cadena Deulen

Some proposed changes:
♦ Please read page and clean up to remove the template that reads: A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (June 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

♦ I have uploaded the author image once more using the upload wizard that I was instructed to use via links from three people, and really hope the issues around the image are cleared up and everyone understands that I created the image. The creator of the image (me) wants in on this wiki page. The subject has given permission to have it on this wiki page. Just please put the image up in such a way that it stops getting flagged. Just go and use the newly uploaded image. I do not know how many more times or ways I must explain that "yes, I created this image and the subject gives permission for the image to be used here and I give permission for the image to be used here and I want it to be used here and have given up all rights to the image." Yes, the image appears elsewhere on the internet. Those other places have my permission, too. Please allow me to stop worrying about this and be done.

Thank you. --MinimumMax (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Reply 17-JUN-2019
Hello and thank you for your request. It appears that the photo in the article is displaying properly. I've cropped it slightly to remove areas at the periphery, and centered the photo with a newer caption giving the year it was presumably taken. As far as the COI maintenance template, my guess is that material you've added over the years is what has prompted the placing of this tag, since you appear to have a connection to the subject. If this material were to be removed all at once then the template could be removed — but that would leave the article bare, which would not be an ideal situation. The COI tag acts as a compromise allowing for this material to remain here in the article for now. The ideal scenario would have this material replaced by information which is put in the article by uninvolved editors. Having this material added by editors unconnected to the subject is what is needed for the COI tag to be removed. Regards, Spintendo  18:16, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the information and help! But, can you please tell Patrick Rogel to stop flagging it for speedy deletion? He will not listen to me, and insisted again that I am posting content (the picture) that violates copyright. He just did it again. --MinimumMax (talk) 21:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Danielle Cadena Deulen.jpg

Proposed image adjustment
File:Danielle Cadena Deulen.jpg now has OTRS permission. Can someone please re-insert that author image? Thank you. --MinimumMax (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:45, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Potential sources for expansion
Moving these links here. TJMSmith (talk) 12:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * "Revision" on Poetry Daily
 * "American Curse” and “We Are Bored” on KROnline
 * "Eyes Like Lithium"
 * "Lacan at the Carousel"
 * Willamette Faculty
 * The Kenyon Review's review of Our Emotions Get Carried Away Beyond Us
 * Drunken Boat's review of Lovely Asunder
 * The Rumpus' review of Lovely Asunder
 * The Iowa Review's review of The Riots
 * Diagram's review of The Riots