Talk:Danielle Egnew

Deletion or major overhaul of psychic section?
The psychic section lacks a neutral tone, and the only sources provided to verify her psychic claims are her official websites. I've already tagged the entire article as being like a resume; it is little more than a vague listing of her accomplishments, with links to external sites, and the psychic section is no exception. I vote to delete the psychic section unless someone is able to verify the psychic claims with a reliable 3rd party source and makes the tone more neutral.== Deletion or major overhaul of psychic section? == The psychic section lacks a neutral tone, and the only sources provided to verify her psychic claims are her official websites. I've already tagged the entire article as being like a resume; it is little more than a vague listing of her accomplishments, with links to external sites, and the psychic section is no exception. I vote to delete the psychic section unless someone is able to verify the psychic claims with a reliable 3rd party source and makes the tone more neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon1930 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nmillerche (talk • contribs)

FLAG: WIKI PAGE HAZING - Tags in Psychic section removed
Subjective tagging in "Psychic" section removed. This wiki article is not intended to prove or disprove psychic ability but to report on the work of the individual. The tagwords "alleged" and "claims" throughout the section denote information properly. Danielle Egnew is a publicized media personality who additionally works in the paranormal and psychic field. As of September 11 2011 Google reports 22,500 media, television, blog and radio websites documenting this claim when searched using "Danielle Egnew Psychic". WHOIS reports that only four of these 22,500 websites belong to "Danielle Egnew Spiritual Advisory". Please refrain from misusing tags.

rewrite page
Give me a couple weeks, I'm going to tackle this page rewrite. Citations and everything.Sgerbic (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Page Rewrite
As Brandon1930 pointed out before his contribution to the talk page was wiped out by Tht890, an overhaul was needed for the page. Multiple issues existed with over half the citations listed, which went to either broken links, or the page referenced did not support the content it was sourcing. The citation style was updated to meet with Wikipedia's citation format, and the unusable broken links, as well as non WP:RS sources were removed. The psychic section contained no secondary sources, and the content could not be reliably sourced per WP:RS. The article has been rewritten with to be more WP:NPOV, and cleaned up with a more encyclopedic tone. I have removed the notability guideline tag for this page, as the subject meets WP:MUSICBIO per criterion 1, as her professional work as a musician, producer, etc has "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself."Nmillerche (talk) 05:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Damn Nmillerche you beat me too it. The page looks much more like a Wikipedia page now. Sgerbic (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I notice that the section has been re-added, but this time with proper citations. I made some slight changes to the wording to state the claims in a NPOV, as well as to the order of the sections, seeing how the sources from the Psychic section appear to flow from the subject's film and radio career, vice the opposite. Also, discussing the Norma Lopez case, we need to be very careful to differentiate between speaking in the voice of the claimant, as opposed to speaking in Wikipedia's voice. I have adjusted the wording accordingly. Nmillerche (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

2013 deletion request
Why is this article nominted for deletion? Cap020570 (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

It appears the discussion has been initiated at Articles_for_deletion/Danielle_Egnew_(2nd_nomination) concerning the subject's eligibility under notability guidelines. Nmillerche (talk) 21:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Danielle Egnew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130727031210/http://popejane.com/ to http://www.PopeJane.com
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130211011536/http://www.mauricethefishrecords.net:80/index.php/staff to http://www.mauricethefishrecords.net/index.php/staff
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017131243/http://www.artandsoulfestival.org/2012-art-soul-danielle-egnew-presentation/ to http://www.artandsoulfestival.org/2012-art-soul-danielle-egnew-presentation/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Danielle Egnew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017145047/http://tinstarrecords.com/about/danielle-egnew-ceo/ to http://tinstarrecords.com/about/danielle-egnew-ceo/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)