Talk:Danielle Jones (EastEnders)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

OK, I am sorry that the first review was abandoned. I shall be reviewing this. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality: Well written, no discernible grammatical errors. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance: Complies with MOS. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources: Well referenced. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: All references check out and are WP:RS in my opinion.  I fixed ref #38 as the URL had changed. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * C. No original research: I see no evidence of WP:OR.  The storyline plot is not referenced but that is usual for articles about teleplays, films or novels.  I assume WP:GF and that the storyline section is accurate. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects: The article is broad and thorough in its coverage. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * B. Focused: .... and remains focussed admirably. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:10, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias: The article adheres to WP:NPOV Jezhotwells (talk) 22:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: I find no evidence of edit warring, vandalism has been promptly reverted. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Suitable images have been sourced. Images have suitable fair use rationales. They have not been challenged, so should be OK.  They may be challenged if Wikipedia copyright protocols change, but I see no objection to their use in low resolution format to illustrate the themes of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Suitably used images, good captions provided. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: I have no hesitation in passing this as a Good Article.  Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: I find no evidence of edit warring, vandalism has been promptly reverted. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Suitable images have been sourced. Images have suitable fair use rationales. They have not been challenged, so should be OK.  They may be challenged if Wikipedia copyright protocols change, but I see no objection to their use in low resolution format to illustrate the themes of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Suitably used images, good captions provided. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: I have no hesitation in passing this as a Good Article.  Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: I have no hesitation in passing this as a Good Article.  Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)