Talk:Dann Huff

VIAF
My correction of the VIAF has been reverted wirh the comment "The other was a different Dann Huff. The French source is wrong." But I dont believe that this, this and this entries (belonging to ) are incorrect. -- Jesi (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The correct was wrong. Because http://viaf.org/viaf/232935576/ is the subject mentioned here while http://viaf.org/viaf/24794956/ isn't. Feel free to fix VIAF. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are right, my comment "correction" was not correct, it should be "changing the VIAF". But your comment "The French source is wrong" was also not correct; so far I have no answer to my questions, if the VIAF-entries given above are right (I think, they are). Now we have to curious situation, that the VIAF-link in the article leads to en entry with only the Czech library, while more important libraries as the US-library of Congress, the French Library and the German National Library (including 40 publications of the person) – given by  – are not available from the article. Normally in the article should be the "better" link. But obviously we are two different kinds of authors. So what. -- Jesi (talk) 13:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Since I don't understand your question I am unable to answer it. In short, fix VIAF, do not break the English Wikipedia. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)