Talk:Danny Hilman Natawidjaja

"Further Reading"
Skyerise, as I said in my (typoed) edit summary, these further reading articles are not really appropriate. Each has a brief quote from the subject in the context of some sort of geologic topic. They do not help interested readers learn more about the article subject per MOS:FURTHER. If you're preparing to use them as sources, that's all well and good, but I do not think they should be 'warehoused' this way. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Complaints about my editing style are premature. Do I have to put a "work in progress" notice at the top to be left alone while I work? Skyerise (talk) 18:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * No, but if you’d planned to use them as sources and wanted to store them you should have put them here. Doug Weller  talk 18:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Tell you what, I edit how I like to and you do the same. You know you're only harassing me because of your biases. Skyerise (talk) 19:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

More refutation of Hilman's Gunung Padang nonsense
‘Really, really weak’: experts attack claim that Indonesia site is ‘world’s oldest building’. Doug Weller talk 14:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)