Talk:Danny Keough

Article not sourced and person of questionable notability
This article needs to be sourced and the notability of this person should be established.--Fahrenheit451 23:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree. I tagged it as non-notable. I also removed the Project Scientology box since his religion is not even mentioned in the article. Imagine if every Catholic had a Project Roman Catholic box on their bios. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Expanded the article w/ (35) sources, expanded info on Scientology. Cirt (talk) 00:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Cirt. I am still not sure that he is a notable Scientologist however.Steve Dufour (talk) 02:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. Perhaps, perhaps not.  But he is notable as a person.  Cirt (talk) 03:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Sections
I've divided the article into sections to make it more readable, but the current layout is probably awkward. Ideally, the article should be rewritten and/or rearranged to conform more closely with the Wikipedia formatting guidelines for biographies. Laval (talk) 15:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)