Talk:Dano-Norwegian

Neutrality
I think this article needs some revision. Firstly, the term Dano-Norwegian isn't primarily derogatory. In addition to being an adjective concerning Denmark-Norway up until 1814, it may be used by anybody with reference to the official language in Norway during most of the 19th century. Also, many linguists, be they Bokmål users or Nynorsk users, denote Bokmål and/or Riksmål as Dano-Norwegian scientifically, not derogatorily. Secondly, when describing the secondary, pejorative use of the term, the article must avoid being pejorative itself. --Eddi (Talk) 00:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree and look forward to seeing this rewritten. In the English language Dano-Norwegian may be a  noun  used [primarily] by linguists in a more esoteric/scholarly manner to refer to Bokmål. It may also be an  adjective  referring either to anything relating to both Denmark and Norway (e.g. "Dano-Norwegian joint committee", as analogous to "Sino-American relations" or the "Russo-Japanese War"). In a pre-1814 context it refers to the now defunct personal union of Denmark-Norway. //Big Adamsky 03:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Dano-Norwegian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051201210438/http://www.sprakrad.no:80/templates/Page.aspx?id=7357 to http://www.sprakrad.no/templates/Page.aspx?id=7357

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Good job, thanks. The archived article is fine - indeed, it is also interesting. :)  Hordaland (talk) 20:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)