Talk:Daria Khaltourina

Source
Peace Print and Protestantism 1450 1558 by CSL Davies Fontan 1995,; already rehearsed and proposed these arguments in relation to literacy and trade. No reason that a current Russian academic would not know of this 85.210.0.29 (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Interest and bias
I don't think that there is enough evidence that this person is reputable, and the information does not sound impartial either. The whole highly praising tone of the article is fitting for a resume rather than objective information in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place to advertize yourself (hint: your own website, linkedin, etc). Completely shameless. 87.64.58.250 (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I agree.. delete this,. the objectivity of Wikipedia has reached an alltime low. And it wasn't a high standard to begin with — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.84.244.60 (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Either edit the article to fix the problem, or propose it for deletion. Do not persistently blank the page; you will be blocked. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 12:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)