Talk:Dark shyshark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay -I will make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning). I will jot questions down below Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


 * ...actually I can't find much to fault it on....


 * It'd be good to get a source for the map File:Haploblepharus pictus distmap.png
 * Done.

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * technically ok for GA, if one were to go to FAC I think you'd be asked for a Reliable Source for the range map

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Thanks for the review! -- Yzx (talk) 18:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)