Talk:Darkrai

Electric type?
Am I the only one who saw this Pokémon's name and thought "WTF? It's not an Electric-type?". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.116.10 (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Someone probably mistook "rai" and thought it was refering to thunder. - Saturn  Yoshi  THE VOICES 19:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

deleted
Deleted a rather nasty comment :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.181.18.107 (talk) 04:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC).

Wrong Info
I fixed the info about the actual event. There is no diary in the event.

Also, I do believe Bad Dreams is not like Nightmare, seeing as how Nightmare does damage based on level. I think what it really meant was Dream Eater.-Aruceus
 * Yeah, except Dream Eater doesn't deal damage over time and heals the user? :x While both Nightmare and Bad Dreams deal damage over time to sleeping foes.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 04:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You two are getting Nightmare confused with Night Shade.As Nightmare works like Asorb when the foe is asleep and Night Shade does damage equal to the foes level. Just thought I would point that out. (LatiRider 07:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC))
 * ....Nightmare doesn't recover health. And this discussion is a month old, if you bothered to read.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 07:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Random Vandalism
Deleted a random thing that had literally nothing to do with this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.227.220.213 (talk • contribs)

Game Information Added
Oblivion@Serebii has added some game information —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.101.116 (talk • contribs)

Surprisingly Dark?
How is it surprising that a pokemon named DARKrai is a dark type. I understand it looks like a ghost but look at its name. And it has two references to it in the article. I can understand the first one, but it the video game section it seems like overkill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.38.129 (talk) 11:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

In my opinion, you're thinking about it wrong. I see where you're going, but he was still talking in terms of appearance, and not of the name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.12.31 (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Upcoming?
"...in the upcoming Pokémon movie Pokémon: The Rise of Darkrai." Perhaps a different word should be chosen, as it might seem to the viewer that the movie hasn't been released yet.

Tense
"In the video games" speaks partially in future tense in paragraph 2, when the events have already occurred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.12.31 (talk) 07:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Protected?
Hi, I noticed this page was protected. I otherwise wouldn't care but I think it redirects to the wrong place. It should redirect to List of Pokémon (481–493). Second, anyone? Tez kag 72 21:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I second that motion. Solar Flute (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirect
This page should redirect to the Pokémon instead of the movie. --75.10.49.117 (talk) 14:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed.
 * The page should redirect to List of Pokémon (481–493) like all other Pokémon without articles and it probably no longer needs full page protection—I'm not sure it ever did—as it is now as likely to be vandalized as any other Pokémon redirect. —Ost (talk) 22:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ As to the necessity of the protection, I gather it's there to enforce an AfD decision, but you can raise it at WP:RFUP if you think the protection is completely unnecessary. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 29 December 2016
Please edit this page to redirect directly to List of generation IV Pokémon, to avoid a double redirect. Thank you! —Granger (talk · contribs) 17:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ — xaosflux  Talk 15:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)