Talk:Darwin (disambiguation)

See Talk:Darwin for some discussion of what to have Darwin be. As I see it, there are currently only two options: I favor the second option, and if there's strong opposition to going ahead with that option, I'd like to hear some reasons not to do that, rather than just hearing "there's been consensus for a long time..." That just means that no one's bothered to try changing anything in a long time. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be changed. Anyway, whichever option we choose, clearly the current one doesn't make any sense, so I'll be satisfied whichever of the two we choose, and pleased if we choose the second. But clearly we need to discuss this a bit first. So let's do that now. -Silence 03:45, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Move Darwin (disambiguation) to Darwin. There's no point having the "(disambiguation)" tag when the "Darwin" page itself is nothing but a redirect to here. It's extraneous, inefficient step-adding. When the page itself is a disambig, it doesn't need a disambiguation parenthetical clause added; that's just for when we can't use the main page, Darwin in this case.
 * 2) Change Darwin to redirect to Charles Darwin, and link to the disambiguation page at the top of Charles Darwin.
 * Option 1 carried out.--Commander Keane 08:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Hm. OK, good enough! Thanks for the help. -Silence 11:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Darwin which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)