Talk:Data driven science

Notability problem
The primary requirement for the existence of an article (and stub) here is notability. One reference doesn't establish this subject as notable enough for an article. Please develop this quickly before it gets nominated for deletion. As it is it may not last a day. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Hahaha! What? This is a community of volunteerism and collaboration, no? And There is no deadline, right? Well if it gets taken down within a day its an opportunity wasted. The amount of time I choose to spend on developing the article is not an indication of how notable the topic is. I can find more references, indeed I can think of two more off the top of my head, but it takes time to find these and include them, I suggest: be patient, or help out!!! (Indeed the community may ultimately judge the topic not notable enough for its own article (I suspect it is though), but the content is almost certainly worthy development and inclusion somewhere in wikipedia. So why not start with its own article and see how it turns out? By making a quick stub article out of it I was hoping it might inspire others to help out on developing it. Ha ha ha! Best wishes! :) --Oceans and oceans (talk) 11:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This was just copied, slightly tweaked from Science 2.0 without attribution. As such it was a copyright violation, and also extremely trivial. I've redirected it but if anyone wishes to make a real article out of it using reliable sources showing that it's a notable subject, feel free. I think that's definitely possible. Dougweller (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)