Talk:Datawarehousing

From VfD:

Redundant with Data warehouse. Offers nothing of encyclopedic merit. Marketing material / resume, smells like copyvio. Anon self-promotional addition. - KeithTyler 23:39, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * This can be redirected without listing here. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 00:27, 2004 Sep 2 (UTC)
 * Make it a redirect and lose its current content. I can see why it was listed here -- there is information that will be destroyed in the redirect.  In this case, the information present is worthy of deletion. Geogre 00:49, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I agree with you - so, Keep because you state in your reason it is a valid-enough topic for Data warehouse, which you want to keep. Please read: What to list and not list on VfD. You can merge and redirect without nominating for deletion. Davodd 12:15, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * I listed it to gain group consensus over whether anything in the article should be saved (merge) or not (delete). Some of it may have been deemed of use to Data warehouse. Furthermore, it was clearly a vanity page, which is listed on Deletion policy next to the words "list on vfd." It just so happened to be a commercial vanity page. KeithTyler 17:12, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * Now redirected to Data warehouse. Keep redirect (or at least recreate it if you feel strongly that the history must be purged).  Rossami 22:56, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Redundant would be a reason to redirect. Keep (as redirect or whatever). anthony (see warning) 15:07, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion