Talk:Datebook (American magazine)

Protected edit request on 20 April 2016
This should redirect to appointment book or to a disambig, see http://onelook.com/?w=datebook&ls=a

Espoo (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You need to give a specific suggested change. Do you think it should be a redirect to appointment book or a disambig page?   If you think it should be a disambiguation page you will need to specify what pages in the encyclopedia can be known as Datebook.  Since this redirect was the result of a discussion at AFD we would need a new discussion this time at WP:RFD.  You can create the discussion and an admin can add the RFD banner to the page.  -- GB fan 13:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 6 September 2020
Remove pp-protected and replace with redirect shell to fix categorisation. Same reason as Talk:Take_the_time ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What this needs is for the protection to be lifted. Some sort of protection must have made sense back in 2015, when it appears that a disruptive user was trying to overwrite the then article about a magazine with content about an unrelated company with the same name, but it's hard to see why this should continue to make the redirect inaccessible to editing five years on. See also the previous edit request from 2016, which points out one obvious problem with this redirect. If it weren't protected, the issue would have been fixed a long time ago. Given that the protecting admin hasn't edited in almost two years, it will make sense for unprotecting to be considered by whoever answers this edit request. – Uanfala (talk) 19:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 19:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)