Talk:Dave Brubeck Quartet (album)

Useful source
A bit more info: That cover would be a very nice image to have here! Martinevans123 (talk) 21:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, unfortunately my cover is about 20% missing.   78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 21:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha, I know the feeling. But why 78:26?? ... surely 78:33 might better suit?! Martinevans123 (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 78.26 is the precise rpm of "78s" in the United States for records after about 1928. See last paragraph under Gramophone record.    78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 21:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * wow, what a purist! in awe... Martinevans123 (talk) 21:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * nutcase is probably more accurate...   78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 21:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * ... nuts have a certain purity, I've always found. So glad to have bumped into you here. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Likewise! Thanks for your contributions.  I've added some more sources, it's all I've got for now.  The original album artwork is quite different than that pictured at brubeck.info.  Should I take a picture of my damaged cover, hoping someone else will eventually have a better copy?  I would appreciate it if you'd review the article again for accuracy and prose flow.  Again, many thanks!    78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 01:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Well that image in the brubeck-info link above seems to be the only example on the internet. So your photo would be quite a bonus. Having said that, I guess the priority would be for an image of the cover of the original Fantasy label 10" version, an example of which is here. I guess that one could be used. (I see there are a few of these currently for sale on US eBay - note the red vinyl - groovy - one even on green vinyl!)Martinevans123 (talk) 18:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * What a great addition! Well done. Looks great, even if a little "well-used" - and shows that there really is a record in there! Martinevans123 (talk)
 * Thanks! Fortunately the record is in considerably better shape than the jacket.    78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 09:13, 17 December 2012 (UTC)