Talk:David Bierk

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on David Bierk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526215339/http://www.rca-arc.ca/en/about_members/since1880.asp to http://www.rca-arc.ca/en/about_members/since1880.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Deleted sources in early life section
This is a section to discuss the unknown reason for this edit, which deleted sourcing I had spent some time finding. The "biography" section also does not make sense; all of the article is the biography. Anyway, discuss. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Unfortunately ThatMontreallP would not allow even a few minutes for another user to complete edits without seeing what the ultimate result or purpose would be. It can take a few minutes to merge sections in order to create a more effective narrative. Artslettersperson (talk) 02:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)


 * This article is already marked as being in poor shape with respect to sources. New unsourced material should not be added; that makes a problem article even worse.


 * You have sources for the material you're adding? Put them in with your edits. You don't have sources for the material you're adding? Then leave that material out.


 * You want to spend a period drafting, with an "ultimate result", including sources, later? Please don't use the final article space for that. Use your sandbox and bring it over when it's fit for article space. Don't draft in mainspace. TJRC (talk) 04:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Removal of lists
Exhibitions and collections should be condensed into narrative form and merged with the overall narrative biography. Bullet point lists are inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. Artslettersperson (talk) 02:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Bullet point lists are entirely fine, especially for sections with many items.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)