Talk:David Byrne (album)

Fair use rationale for Image:DavidByrneCD.jpg
Image:DavidByrneCD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Styled "davidenryd"?!
I have to say I find all these contrived mentions of "styled XYZ" in articles quite silly. (Like how the Friends article used to say "stylized as F•R•I•E•N•D•S" because the on-screen title included some decorative dots, even though they obviously weren't part of the name and no-one ever referred to it like that, unlike (say) M*A*S*H.)

In this case, the article claims the title is styled as "davidenryd". Well, if you really want to make that point, no, it's not. You've represented the "b" of "byrne" backwards as a "d", but all the other letters are the right way round. It's not "enryd", it's "byrne" mirrored. (How would this be shown? Beats me- I wasn't the one who wanted it included!)

Either way though, making a deal of this is pointless blurring of the line between graphical design and the title proper. Unless someone has officially implied this is the title, I'd leave it out.

Ubcule (talk) 22:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)