Talk:David C. White

WP:LEAD
Which says, "The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article"... being nominated for a major award, which has its own section in the body of the article is pretty much the definition of what should be included in the lead.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:00, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * btw - FA bios which mention nominations in the lead: Amy Adams, Bradley Cooper, Jessica Chastain, Kirsten Dunst, John Gielgud, Jake Gyllenhaal, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Ethan Hawke, and Philip Seymour Hoffman... there are others. I stopped there on the list.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * And before you throw about terms like WP:OWN, you really should understand them. Might I suggest you pay particular attention to WP:OAS?  As well as WP:OWNBEHAVIOR?  It would be one thing if I was simply reverting without leaving a summary.  Or if I was simply disagreeing with your edit.  However, your edits have no basis in policy or guidelines, as I have clearly shown.  In fact, they contravene the guidelines regarding wp:lead.  Your canard about "FA articles not having this type of content" has been shown to be patently false. And you continue to refuse to engage on the talk page. Hmmm.... who's showing tendencies of WP:OWN?  Your arguments boil down to a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Might I suggest you refrain from these types of edits in the future? Onel 5969  TT me 11:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)