Talk:David Charles Manners

Poorly sourced, promotional bio
This bio is going to need to be rewritten if sources are not provided soon for all these quotations. When I did some digging, I found that the sources were being misrepresented to give glowing reviews; in fact, the reviews were rather mixed, even negative. In light of this, I have templated all the remaining quotations as needing a real citation so that they can be checked. If they aren't, then I'm removing them as suspect and possibly disingenuous. There's way too much puffery in this article, and it needs to be fixed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I see that my efforts to rework the promotional edits have been reverted, and this biography right back to its previous state as a hagiography that blatantly misrepresents the reviews. I'm this close to seeking administrative intervention or attempting to delete this article.  Unless it gets cleaned up soon, I'm going to go through with a hatchet and turn it into a stub.  Almost nothing is reliably sourced, and the reviews are blatant lies.  This is worse than not even having an article.   if you continue this behavior, I'll file a complaint against you and have you blocked from editing Wikipedia.  This is your final warning. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)