Talk:David Dickens

rubbish
This article absolutely does not respect the majority view that Dickens was a man, not well respected and he was fired. So most of what is written is a load of rubbish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnobrien98 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see the BLP banner at the top of this page - even if it is true, the claims need to have been published by a reliable source - I see nothing to substaniate those comments at the New Zealand Herald for example. Putting "he was sacked" three times in the article without any reference is counterproductive and against the policy for WP:BLP, as well as WP:NPOV. XLerate (talk) 00:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 12:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Merge proposal
Given that the issues surrounding the subject of this article happened a while back and were seemingly a flash in the pan, maybe merging it into Centre for Strategic Studies would make sense. Deepred6502 (talk) 06:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)