Talk:David Flynn (composer)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 one external links on David Flynn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080807124726/http://www.daveflynn.com/songwriter.htm to http://www.daveflynn.com/songwriter.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080807124742/http://www.daveflynn.com/Irish.htm to http://www.daveflynn.com/Irish.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080321165221/http://www.daveflynn.com:80/Classical.htm to http://www.daveflynn.com/Classical.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726190042/http://www.irishcomposerscollective.org/composers.html to http://www.irishcomposerscollective.org/composers.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:52, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

PUFFERY and ATTRIBUTEPOV
Editors insistent on adding or restoring words like "famed", "acclaimed", "prominent", "important", "successful", "noteworthy", "renowned", "leading" or "ground-breaking" should perhaps consider: Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) The motivation for doing so. As per the WP:NPOV policy, editors are generally expected to edit from neutral point-of-view. A determination to add (or restore) words like the above doesn't indicate a neutral stance.
 * 2) The means of doing so. As per the MOS:PUFFERY guidelines, regardless of the motivation, if the goal is to indicate relative importance (to distinguish Bob Dylan from "my mate Colm who wrote a song once"), terms which declare importance subjectively should be replaced with facts and attribution which demonstrate importance objectively.
 * 3) The manner of attribution. As per the WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV and WP:VER guidelines, if a subjective opinion is expressed, then it should be clear that it is someone's opinion. And whose opinion it is. With a clear and verifiable reference. That isn't extrapolated or interpretted.