Talk:David Gareji monastery complex

Untitled
It was full of redlinks when I got here, it's shoddy and has a poverty of words. As I don't know anything about the topic, I decided to tag the page and leave it for someone more knowledgable. - Bladeswin 00:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Part of that ugliness was the presence of the image tags, which I've removed for now. They can be reinstated later if necessary. There are few paragraphing issues at this stage. Bobo. 19:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on David Gareja monastery complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070929095720/http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20070503-033409-4589r to http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20070503-033409-4589r
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160107045745/http://www.encyclopedie-universelle.com/images/georgie-carte-monasteres-david-gareji.gif to http://www.encyclopedie-universelle.com/images/georgie-carte-monasteres-david-gareji.gif
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150402141305/http://www.byzantium.ac.uk/frameset_fieldwork.htm?fieldwork/reports/eastmond_2001 to http://www.byzantium.ac.uk/frameset_fieldwork.htm?fieldwork/reports/eastmond_2001

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on David Gareja monastery complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070708090756/http://www.geotimes.ge/index.php?m=home&newsid=3887 to http://www.geotimes.ge/index.php?m=home&newsid=3887

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Map of Georgia
Article says that David Gareja monastery complex is "Georgian Orthodox monastery complex located in the Kakheti region of Eastern Georgia" and only "Part of the complex is located in the Agstafa rayon of Azerbaijan". I think it is misleading to show Azerbaijan map (red dot on it) and not Georgian. P.S. Most other language articles show Georgian map.D.Goletiani (talk) 08:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Name
This is a 6th century Georgian monastery, whatever angle i look at it, i don't see how relevant it is to add an Azerbaijani name for it. Azerbaijani ethnos was completed by the end of the 16th century, some 1000 years after the foundation of this complex and has nothing to do with it. Azerbaijani claims on parts of their neighbours' territories doesn't matter. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  22:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Here we go, i had already opened a section for this discussion, your "biased POV" title shows only one thing, your lack of neutrality in this matter. Again, this monastery has been founded by Georgians in the 6th century, so 1000 years before "Azerbaijanis people" emerged, and is of great significance for the Georgian people while it's only considered as a strategic position by the Azerbaijani gov, don't see how your addition was legit. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  22:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

, "it's only considered as a strategic position by the Azerbaijani gov", your lack of neutrality is also visible :))), I'm not saying that Azerbaijani Turks founded the church, it is factually impossible. As a closest successor to the Caucasian Albania, the official language of Azerbaijan must be used as the alternative. Another thing, if the subject of the article has multiple names, all must be indicated in the lead, if there are too much, then a separate section shall be created, like in here. --► Sincerely:  A¥×aᚢ ⚔  Zaÿïþzaþ€  22:47, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Seriously ??? you're kidding me right ? We already had this discussion once, how is the Azerbaijan Republic, a state created in 1918, a "closest successor to the Caucasian Albania" ??? Caucasian Albania's history goes from 6th century BC to 8th century AC ! how can you claim such nonsense ? Once again, You behave like a POV pusher, blinded by your pro-Azerbaijani nationalism, unfortunately ... ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  21:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , I like how Persian nationalists call me a Azerbaijani nationalist or Pan-Turkist, while Azerbaijani nationalists call me a traitor/Armenian etc. When I mention "Azerbaijani", I don't imply Turkic. Talysh, Avars, Khinalug people are also Azerbaijani. I'm talking about Azerbaijan as a historical region, not a Republic formed in 1918. I do acknowledge the Turkification process of the 12th century. Btw, Turkic Azerbaijan's oldest nation is not ADR, it is Ak/Qara Koyunlu at the least. I can same the same thing about POV-pushing about you. For example, look at this article. Built by Tibetans, but in a disputed territory within the control of India, but lead mentions its Urdu name. --► Sincerely:  A¥×aᚢ ⚔  Zaÿïþzaþ€  21:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * "I'm talking about Azerbaijan as a historical region, not a Republic formed in 1918" There was no "Azerbaijan" north of Aras before 1918, again, you refuse to get the point.
 * "Turkic Azerbaijan's oldest nation is not ADR, it is Ak/Qara Koyunlu at the least" Even these 14th century entities are far from being a "closest successor" of Caucasian Albania ...
 * "I can same the same thing about POV-pushing about you." Please be my guest, go ahead and provide evidences for your claim, otherwise, this is nothing else than a personal attack of yours, i.e. your usual behaviour when you come short of arguments. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  21:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Biased POV
This revert is totally baseless,. It is a disputed territory, MUST be named both in Azerbaijani and Georgian, per neutral point-of-view. Contrary, is just a proof is biased editing. Also, Azerbaijani sources claim that it is Albanian church. --► Sincerely:  A¥×aᚢ ⚔  Zaÿïþzaþ€  22:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)