Talk:David Harsanyi

POV
The "Critical Response" section is one of the most one-sided pieces of writing I've ever seen at Wikipedia. Almost all of the citations are from right wing sources that support Harsanyi; the only "critical response" mentioned is from anonymous fulminating letter writers, framed to make them look bad. -- Jibal (talk) 01:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * , I've deleted a couple of the reviews that I think were the most biased. I included all the negatives that I was able to find, and you are free to add negative reviews. The problem is that his work is so very seldom reviewed, let alone by liberal sources, and Wikipedia editors are required to write from published secondary sources. I look forward to your contributions. −− Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Here are two possible sources reviewing his latest booK;
 * Claremont Review
 * Reason, free minds and free markets
 * − Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)