Talk:David Lee Miller (academic)

Objectivity
The article reads: "The work is theoretically sophisticated, but Miller's playful, engaging style has been praised for avoiding the turgidity and pretentious jargon that have characterized much academic literary criticism in recent decades." Does this sound objective? Or does it sound like partisan propaganda, unsubstantiated and dispensable? It sounds like the latter to me. The work "has been praised"? By whom? It avoids "turgidity and pretentious jargon"? Says who? Oulipal (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)