Talk:David M. Kiely

Notability
Is David M. Kiely considered notable enough for his own article? WP:AUTHOR says he should meet one of the following to be deemed notable and I am struggling to find sources that say he meets any of these criteria.

Dobble stein talk 21:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; or
 * The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; or
 * The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary *subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a *single episode of a television series); or
 * The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.