Talk:David Meerman Scott/Archives/2013

Reassessment Needed
The tone (nothing but positive) and especially lack of RS cites for anecdotes (see first paragraph) don't shout "Good Article". EBY (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:GAR Woz2 (talk) 10:50, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I also removed the tag that says the article lacks a NPOV. The article was peer reviewed during GAN and the community found its POV to pass. If you want to override the peer review, as I suggest above, please use WP:GAR. Thanks! Woz2 (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)