Talk:David Pannick, Baron Pannick

Untitled
David Pannick QC won for Mr. Thompson, the high-profile case.

--Florentino floro (talk) 06:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Latest high profile cases
I added these 3 links to show his latest high profile cases handled: *timesonline.co.uk, Judges will carry on holding ministers to account - because that’s their job*guardian.co.uk, Unmarried sisters lose inheritance tax fight*thelawyer.com, Northern Rock showdown: It's Grabiner vs Beloff and Pannick --Florentino floro (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * He is the counsel of Gary McKinnonscmagazineuk.com, NASA hacker appeals to House of Lords to overturn extradition--Florentino floro (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on David Pannick, Baron Pannick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160321194433/http://www.blackstonechambers.com/people/barristers/lord_pannick_qc.html to http://www.blackstonechambers.com/people/barristers/lord_pannick_qc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

1992 Maastrict case?
It was mentioned in the House of Commons today (2019-03-27) that Lord Pannick represented Rees Mogg in 1992 in arguing that the government could not ratify the Maastrict treaty -- is this notable enough for inclusion? Source: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/1993/4.html ; see Hansard for reference. 2A00:23C0:FA11:F100:255F:442F:F950:E2F5 (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

2019 Prorogation case
Pannick has been representing the case in court - outcome currently awaited - that Boris Johnson's government acted illegally in proroguing parliament for an unusually long period, allegedly to ensure that the UK leave the European Union without a deal by preventing parliament from stopping this from happening.

--peter_english (talk) 14:29, 5 September 2019 (UTC)