Talk:David Peters (paleoartist)

Claims
The claims section should absolutely be included, there is no more reliable source on Peters' notoriously controversial claims than Peters himself. Wolfemoods (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Read WP:BLPSPS, particularly criterion 1: it is not unduly self-serving. Peters has spouted so many claims over the years that there's no way that they could all be reasonably be included. Users deciding based on their owns whims which of his claims are the most notorious or infamous is an act of WP:OR. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

New reconstructions
Most of his reconstructions are bad, but his verions of Coelurosauravus, Ubirajara, Yi qi, and Ambopteryx make sense. I am a Green Bee (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)