Talk:David Steinberg (crossword editor)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on David Steinberg (crossword editor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109143744/http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20110801/NEWS01/708019965/-1/news01 to http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20110801/NEWS01/708019965/-1/news01
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160502071934/http://www.king5.com/home/Edmonds-14-yos-crosswords-published-in-NYT-126647778.html/ to http://www.king5.com/home/Edmonds-14-yos-crosswords-published-in-NYT-126647778.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

COI issues
A look at the history shows a massive number of edits (in frequency and in terms of contribution to this overly detailed article) have come from SPAs, initially a registered user, then numerous IPs. Unashamedly promotional, overly detailed. I will fix it in due course. I remind anyone with any link to the subject to refrain from editing as per WP:COI. Rayman60 (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

@Rayman60 Yes, that's because I keep having more puzzles published. Is that a problem? --D


 * It's not a problem to have more puzzles published, that point is irrelevant as far as this issue goes. The problem is the onus is on independent editors to add content, not for someone to use it to promote themselves as per WP:NOTCV. Rayman60 (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

@Rayman60 Citations have been added, tally of published puzzles has been consolidated. Article is no more self-promoting than other Wikipedia pages by leading constructors. David Steinberg is not the author of this page and has not edited it at any time; his manager is. Hope this addresses your concerns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.174.248.173 (talk) 02:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

No, it doesn't. The manager CLEARLY has a conflict on interest!! Rayman60 (talk) 20:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)