Talk:Day One (Torchwood)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: JuneGloom    Talk  21:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Good evening/afternoon/morning! I'll review this article momentarily. - JuneGloom    Talk  21:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I took care of a couple of typos and a repetition.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No dead links and the sources look okay to me. I can't see any evidence of original research.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * The article is stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The images are good, one fair use with a proper rationale and one free one respectively.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just one thing and nothing to really stop me from passing the article, but at the end of the first paragraph in Filming it says; "However, the sequence had to be shot again twelve days later." Was a reason given for this?
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just one thing and nothing to really stop me from passing the article, but at the end of the first paragraph in Filming it says; "However, the sequence had to be shot again twelve days later." Was a reason given for this?