Talk:Day labor

Requested move 2 September 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Day labor → Daily labor – More number of ngrams found.

Jeaucques (talk) 13:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I think you might be misreading it. The Google Ngrams actually show that "day labor" is more common, though it is fairly close. Regardless, better to keep the current title as "day laborer" redirects here and it is much more common than "daily laborer". Rreagan007 (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose Agree with Rreagan007 with slightly misreading the ngrams but also: we don't move only based on ngrams and, perhaps more importantly, for phrases like this you need to be sure that you're not getting false matches. The phrase "daily labor" is used but it tends to be used about a different concept: the total amount of labor available on any particular day for businesses, which includes non-day laborers. While "day labor" seems to be almost exclusively used to describe the topic of this article, hiring/working on a single/day-to-day basis. Skynxnex (talk) 02:14, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * strong oppose that is a different topic -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 06:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Daily labor" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daily_labor&redirect=no Daily labor] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 67.70.25.175 (talk) 06:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)